Nearly a month after Git vulnerabilities, CVE-2016-2324 and CVE-2016-2315 were made clear to Apple, they have finally been fixed. Upsetting to some, the patched version of Git was released on March 17th, but was not implemented into Xcode by Apple until about 6 weeks later. Apple released a new version of its Xcode development tool this past week, in order to patch two critical vulnerabilities in the Git source code management client. The Git vulnerabilities allow attackers to use malicious code on systems that utilized the initiated cloning operations.
Developers use Xcode to write applications for OS X and iOS as it is an integrated development environment. Xcode includes a package called the OS X Command Line Tools for Xcode, which contained the Git vulnerabilities. Now updated to 2.7.4. version, the Git with the command tools package should be back in working order. System administrators and researchers alike criticized Apple for their lack of timely attention to the patches. Left in the dark and without a patch for 6 weeks, many were forced to resort to hacking in order to disable Git within company Mac machines, not exactly the ideal solution to the problem. When it takes Apple a month and a half to implement the fix, sometimes hackery is the only viable answer.
If you would like to educate yourself in more detail about the information presented in this blog post please visit: Computer World – Apple Patches
Acronis has some issues that need to be addressed; bva has been a serious fan of this product, but in older versions that were rock-solid. I would have to tell you that we are very disappointed with version 2012 and even worked with them directly and even their most tenured technician had problems getting it to work. Also to talk candidly, that technician never got it set up correctly. Bva got a full registered copy of Acronis 2012 True Image. We installed it on a brand new server with a lot of resources as well as a hefty storage target. This storage target has about 7 TB of usable disk space for back up images. This was the first time we installed this version and we had issues at every turn. A summation of the problems are as follows:
When installed, Acronis started making problems including:
- Incredible slowing the speed of the server. When installed, everything was running very slow, enormously time consuming program launch, everything freezes.
- Once Acronis was installed via testing, everything runs as fast as before.
- The server agent refused to load properly and when we got them to install they could not be seen by the back up server(main console).
- Acronis spent several minutes to show the interface. If the backup is lunched (often this freeze the server).
- Bva found the restoration process problematic and painful.
- When we started the recovery from backup, Acronis restarted the server which is ridiculous and would get errors such as “Impossible to read the source. Try the destination again”.
bva then reached out to support and chatted with an Acronis technician, according to a GM of the local office, a Guru where we sat on the phone for 2 hours, reconfigured it from scratch, and they still could not get the back up to work properly. The biggest issues that we see with this product is as follows:
- Difficult to install and configure, needs to be a lot easier
- The indexing of the data takes too long
- The verification process takes way to long
- The process associated on multi-level back up’s are very tough. One job needs to be completed before another starts. We tried to set up a single job where we backed up the data to drives and then to tape. This simple process took almost two days for 4TB.
T-Mobile’s has come out with their first Android tablet, the Samsung Galaxy Tab. It is a good piece of hardware, but it doesn’t have enough great apps to be compelling. It’s hard to compete with other units like it for a variety of reasons, I feel not having enough apps is the largest one. The iPad makes it difficult to set itself aside from the others. Sprint also has its own version that actually came out two weeks ago, but just last week had the chance to play with this version. Both are part of the same line of device and make up the first true tablet competitors to the iPad. I will say this, this unit is sort of a new breed, because unlike the iPad, they’re truly small and light enough to be used on the go. In any case, they’re well built and worth watching, though they need more custom apps to be truly useful. The Samsung Galaxy Tab is about $399-$599. After playing with the unit I feel that the speed is great, nice camera that takes good pictures, and overall great performance.
This unit has 16GB of internal storage plus a memory card slot and the T-Mobile’s 3G network is very fast and reliable which is key. The Galaxy Tab can’t hit T-Mobile’s maximum HSPA+ speeds of 7Mbps, but its got a healthy 2Mbps on the Galaxy Tab’s HSPA 7.2 modem using the Ookla speed test app. The device also has 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi, and it had no trouble connecting to our WPA2 protected network. There’s no Wi-Fi sharing mode, though, but there’s a USB tethering mode. Looking over the web reports it is documented that some people have achieved 7.0 hours of video playback time, with screen brightness set to automatic. The battery life for the galaxy is shorter than the iPad’s battery life, but Apple’s tablet is larger, thus the larger battery. The Galaxy Tab model runs on Android 2.2. But here’s the biggest problem with the Tab: there is currently one good app for Android tablets. It is the new Wall Street Journal app, and it’s just beautiful, with a ‘virtual newspaper’ look and feel that is far easier and more fun to read than, say, the New York Times’ or the AP’s list format. It is reported that more apps are coming, but who really knows when that is happening.
- Device Specifications
- Screen Size- 7 inches
- Storage Capacity- 16 GB
- Dimensions- 7.48 x 4.74 x 0.7 inches
- Weight- 13.4 oz
- Networking Options- 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 3G
- Email Access- Dedicated email app
Verizon and Apple seem to be having problems about getting the iPhone on its network and being able to sell it. It’s pretty funny that as a result, the carrier is getting the iPad instead. Apple and Verizon Wireless today announced that the Apple iPad will be available in more than 2,000 Verizon Wireless retail stores starting October 28.
AT&T still has the exclusive contract with Apple and of course someone got really creative with how to make this happen. Verizon Wireless will not sell the iPad (Wi-Fi + 3G), the version of the tablet that runs on AT&T’s 3G network, it will instead sell the Wi-Fi-only iPad with its own Verizon MiFi 2200 Intelligent Mobile Hotspot.
The iPad will be available in three bundles:
•Apple iPad 16GB + MiFi: $629.99
•Apple iPad 32GB + MiFi: $729.99
•Apple iPad 64GB + MiFi: $829.99
As far as data plans for the iPad, Verizon will offer one: Up to 1GB of data for $20 per month.
Verizon’s bundle prices are the same as what you’d pay for the iPad with integrated AT&T 3G. But Apple and AT&T offer a choice of two service plans: 250MB a month for $14.99 or 2GB month for $25.
Incidentally, AT&T today also announced that it would begin selling the Wi-Fi + 3G iPad in its retail stores on the same day: October 28.
The upside to buying an iPad from Verizon? Versatility: The MiFi provides Internet access for up to five devices at a range of about 30 to 40 feet. But it is one more thing to tote along with you, though the MiFi is only about the size of a pack of cigarettes, but half as thick (3.5 by 2.3 by 0.4 inches).
It’s also one more thing you need to keep charged. Battery life varies depending on how many devices you have connected at once. In our tests, with four Wi-Fi connections, the battery dropped to one bar in an hour. In 90 minutes, it was almost fully drained. On the other hand, we were able to eke out 8 hours and 5 minutes of power on the iPad (Wi-Fi + 3G) running the 3G modem nonstop. Lots of things to consider I suppose but it seems that this offering is a bit premature and not as seamless as it should be.
Apple announced that the company is releasing the beta version of its AirPrint wireless printing for iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch, a key component of Apple’s iOS 4.2 software update, illustrates the extent to which the ability to print wirelessly is being taken by hardware and software developers alike. Although Apple’s products don’t find their way into the offices of small to medium size businesses nearly as often as brands such as HP, Dell and countless others, the capability to print wirelessly, particularly from your mobile device, is becoming of greater importance. Apple announced Hewlett-Packard printers would be the first to support AirPrint with compatible devices to include HP Photosmart, Officejet Pro and LaserJet Pro series ePrint-enabled printers. However, HP offers its own line of printers offering Bluetooth wireless technology, and many more HP printers can be upgraded to support Bluetooth with the purchase of the HP bt500 Bluetooth Adapter. HP notes on its mobile printing Website that while many phones no longer require any further steps, some phones require users to pair their devices prior to printing for the first time.